An analysis of alexander hamiltons discourse on the constitution of the united states
A clash between the two Founding Fathers was inevitable. By its own Article Seventhe constitution drafted by the convention needed ratification by at least nine of the thirteen states, through special conventions held in each state.
Neither, however, thought he could sufficiently prove his case to the impartial observer—in this case, President Washington—by a peremptory invocation of the words of the text. The second option, creating a society homogeneous in opinions and interests, is impracticable.
Separate ratification proceedings took place in each state, and the essays were not reliably reprinted outside of New York; furthermore, by the time the series was well underway, a number of important states had already ratified it, for instance Pennsylvania on December The consequence of it is, that the United States are to a certain extent in the situation of a country precluded from foreign Commerce.
An agrarian law would soon take place. Jefferson was the more revolutionary of the two, and his ringing affirmation of human rights in the Declaration of Independence has inspired much of the world for more than two centuries. This balancing and mixing of judicial oversight and executive prerogative arose, Brown demonstrates, from a coordination between the two branches fostered by Hamilton and his collaborators in the executive and judiciary from the beginning of his tenure as Treasury Secretary. We should remember this first clash between Hamilton and Jefferson there were more to come not so much because it gave us our first national bank as because it gives us a valuable lesson in the demands of constitutional fidelity. A dozen years apart in age— Jefferson was 47 and Hamilton 35 in —they could not have been more different in temperament. First, most educated men, especially those who were at the heart of governing the new country, were extremely familiar with the republics of Ancient Greece and Rome for example, see John Adam's book Defense of the Constitution, published at the same time as The Federalist Papers. Alexander Hamilton, writing as Publius, specifically addressed the power of impeachment in The Federalist 65 and However, he admits that, while his motives for urging ratification of the Constitution are personal, his arguments are open. And both of them knew it. The room being hung around with a collection of the portraits of remarkable men, among them were those of Bacon , Newton and Locke. Alexander Hamilton. In a large republic, the public good is sacrificed to a thousand views; it is subordinate to exceptions, and depends on accidents. The papers inclosed will shew that the nauseous project of amendments has not yet been either dismissed or despatched.
There still are, nevertheless, respectable patrons of opinions, unfriendly to the encouragement of manufactures. Justice Clarence Thomasfor example, invoked Federalist No. The Anti-Federalist belief that the wide disparity in the economic interests of the various states would lead to controversy was perhaps realized in the American Civil Warwhich some scholars attribute to this disparity.
Statue of Alexander Hamilton at U. Rather, this problem had always been the downfall of republics for instance, the fall of the Roman Empire.
based on 8 review